The Giver Read à 104

Read & Download The Giver

The Giver Read à 104 Ë ✈ [PDF / Epub] ✅ The Giver By Lois Lowry ✸ – Insolpro.co.uk The Giver la critiue du film The giver des fans des fans ui veulent avoir une suitepour eux c'est une vidence Combien de films n'ont pas eu le droit une suite forcment si l'on ne fait pas suffisamment The Giver la critiue du film The Giver des fans des The Giver la critiue du film The giver des fans des fans ui veulent avoir une suitepour eux c'est une vidence Combien de films n'ont pas eu le droit une suite forcment si l'on ne fait pas suffisamment de pubs The Giver Film EcranLarge Toutes les informations sur The Giver film ralis par Phillip Noyce avec Brenton Thwaites et Jeff Bridges sorti en Synopsis Dans un futur lointain les The Giver Le film Cinefilcom Seule une personne The Giver a la lourde tche de conserver les motions du pass Jonas un jeune homme comme les autres voit son destin boulevers lorsu’on lui demande de devenir le nouveau Giver Il dcouvre le potentiel infini du monde ui l’entoure mais il Regarder le film The Giver en streaming | BetaSeriescom The Giver The Giver Le Passeur octobre K membres Repoussez les limites Trouvez la vrit Dans un futur lointain les motions ont t radiues en supprimant toute trace d'histoire Seul Le Passeur a la lourde tche de se souvenir du pass en cas de ncessit On demande a lors au jeune Jonas de devenir le prochain Passeur Regarder Video Google Traduction the giver franais | Dictionnaire anglais | Reverso traduction the giver dans le dictionnaire Anglais Francais de Reverso voir aussi 'give'given'give in'give up' conjugaison expressions idiomatiues The Giver le passeur la critiue du film The Giver Le passeur Meryl Streep et Taylor Swift en tte d’affiche fminine Salt la bande annonce Salt Angelina Jolie membre de la CIA The Giver | filmschretiens The Giver Ralis par Phillip Noyce Avec Brenton Thwaites Jeff Bridges Meryl Streep Anne Langue Francais Origine du film Amricain Dans un futur lointain les motions ont t radiues en supprimant toute trace d’histoire Seul The Giver a la lourde tche de se souvenir du pass en cas de ncessit On demande alors au jeune Jonas de devenir The Giver le film – Cocon de littrature The Giver J'ai dj parl du roman de Lois Lowry dans un prcdent article Maintenant j'aimerais discuter de l'adaptation au cinma du livre ui a t diffuse au cinma en octobre Se rangeant dans la. Lowry's book is a piece of nationalist propaganda using oversimplification emotional appeals and dualistic morality to shut down her readers' minds More troubling is that it is aimed at children who don't yet have the critical faculties to defend themselves from such underhanded methodsUnsurprisingly Lowry adopts the structure of the monomyth euating a spiritual journey with a moral one Her Christ figure uses literal magic powers to rebel against his society This rebellion and the morality behind it are presented as 'natural' to contrast with the 'abnormal morality' around himLowry doesn't seem to understand that we get our morality from our culture it isn't something in born that we 'lose' This is the first hint of Lowry's misunderstanding of the human mind She assumes her own morality is correct and then builds her story to fit itShe also makes the character act and think like a modern person would despite never adeuately explaining how he came up with such unusual notions It's the same trick many historical fiction authors use leaving us scratching our heads as to why a Fourteenth Century French peasant speaks like a second wave feminist I'd suggest that Lowry falls to this fault for the same reason they do she has no talent for imagining how others might think differentlyLowry's book ends with the standard nonspecific transgressive spiritual event that marks any overblown monomyth Since the book is not a progressive presentation of ideas it does not suggest any conclusion Instead the climax is a symbolic faux death event symbolic of what none can say Confusingly Lowry later redacts the ending in the seuels undermining the pseudo spiritual journey she createdThough some call this book 'Dystopian' it's closer to the truth to say Lowry borrows elements from the Dystopian authors attempting to combine the spiritual uplift of the monomyth with the political and social deconstruction of the Dystopia What she doesn't recognize is that the faith of the one conflicts with the cynicism of the other She draws on ideas and images from many other authors Bradbury Huxley Orwell Burgess but doesn't improve upon themThese authors created novels that reflected the world around them They based them on the political events of the times presented with realism and careful psychology Though they presented the struggle between the individual and the society they portrayed morality as grey and suffering as the result of individual human faults not political systems Lowry doesn't realize that the best way to critiue Fascism or Communism is not to present it as 'evil' but to simply present it as it wasBut Lowry's world is not based in reality it is symbolic and hyperbolic Instead of writing about how poverty makes the world seem small and dull she has the characters magically unable to experience life Instead of an impersonal government she presents a sort of evil hippy commune The only political system it resembles is a school which is a neat little trick to get the kids interested The idea that 'schoolunfeeling totalitarian hell' is not an uncommon one but it's one I'm surprised teachers would support The book also suggests a creche but lacking similarity to any real world system it doesn't work as a political criticismLowry creates this artificial world to suit her purposes but it is not a symbolic exercise like 'Animal Farm' We understand that the pigs of animal farm are symbolic because there are no talking pigs Lowry's world is insidious since its oversimplification is hidden She builds an artificial world to support the dualist morality that she's pushing She presents the same knee jerk fears about euthanasia and abortion that people use against Women's Rights or Health CareWorse than these Straw Man arguments is the fact that she never deals with the economic causes of totalitarianism Tyrants don't just rise up and take control by their own force of will they come into power because of the socioeconomic situations that surround them Lean times produce strong fascist leaders while profitable times produce permissive liberal societiesStrong centralized leadership simply doesn't self propagate in cultures where everyone is clothed fed and housed The Holocaust was socially about some ideal of 'change' and 'purity' but it was economically about the transmission of wealth from Jews Poles and Catholics to Germans and specifically to those Germans who had elected the new ruling partyThe atrocities of war are for the most part committed by normal people on other normal people By presenting the power structure as 'amoral' and 'inhuman' Lowry ignores the fact that people will willingly cause others to suffer Painting the enemy as 'evil' and 'alien' is just an unsophisticated propagandist methodShe contrasts her 'evil' with the idealized 'goodness' of emotion beauty and freedom This is nothing than the American dream of 'specialness' that Mr Rogers was pushing for so many years We are all special we are all good we all deserve love and happiness Sure it sounds good but what does it meanWhere does this 'specialness' come from If it is just the 'sanctity of human life' then it's not really special because it's all encompassing If all of us are special then none of us are There's nothing wrong with valuing life but when Lowry presents one mode of life as valuable and another as reprehensible she ceases to actually value humanity as a whole Instead she values a small idealized chunk of humanity 'People are good except the ones I don't like' is not a moral basis nor is it a good message to send to kidsIf the specialness is only based on fitting in with a certain moral and social guideline then Lowry isn't praising individuality she's praising herd behavior The protagonist is only 'special' because he has magic powers His specialness is not a part of his character it is an emotional appealThe idea of being a special individual is another piece of propaganda and its one kids are especially prone to because kids aren't special they are carefully controlled and powerless Giving a character special powers and abilities and then using that character to feed a party line to children is not merely disingenuous it's disturbingThere is also a darker side to universal specialness giving a child a sense of importance without anything to back it up creates egotism and instability Adults noticed that children with skills and friends had high self esteems but instead of teaching their children social skills and knowledge they misunderstood the causal relationship and tried to give them self worth firstUnfortunately the moment unsupported self worth is challenged the child finds they have nothing to fall back on Their entitlement didn't come from their skills or experiences and so they have nothing to bolster that sense of worth Instead any doubt sends them down a spiral of emotional instabilityA single book like this wouldn't be the cause of such a state in a child but it does act as part of the social structure built to give a sense of worth without a solid base for that worth People like to believe they are special kids especially so but being a remarkable person is not a result of belief but of actions If the book had informed them then it would leave them better off but giving them a conclusion based on emotional appeals does nothing to build confidence or characterMany people have told me this book is good because it appeals to children but children often fall for propaganda Children develop deep relationships with pop stars breakfast cereals and Japanese monsters This does not make them good role models for childrenFeeding 'specialness' to kids along with a political message is no better than the fascist youth programs Lowry intends to criticize The obsession with individuality is just another form of elitism It's ironic that people in America most often describe themselves as individuals when pointing out the things they do to align themselves with groupsBut banding together in a community is not a bad thing For Lowry and other 'Red Scare' children any mention of 'communal' can turn into a witch hunt but we all give up some personal rights and some individuality in order to live in relatively safe structured societies There are benefits to governmental social controls and there are drawbacks and it's up to us to walk the line between the two Anarchy and Totalitarianism never actually exist for long we are social animalsIt's not difficult to understand why Lowry is so popular especially amongst educators The message she gives aligns perfectly with what they were taught as kids from Red Scare reactionism to the hippy dippy 'uniue snowflake' mantra These ideas aren't entirely misguided either It's good to recognize the benefits of difference and the dangers of allowing other to control our livesIf a reader believes that fascism and socialism are inherently wrong and that their own individuality is their greatest asset they will likely sympathize with Lowry's work However this doesn't make the book honest nor beneficial One of the hardest things we can do as readers is disagree with the methods of authors we agree with ideologicallyIt makes us feel good to find authors who agree with us but this is when we should be at our most skeptical Searching the world for self justification is not a worthwhile goal it simply turns you into another short sighted argumentative know it all 'Yes men' never progressLowry is toeing the party line She does not base her book around difficult uestions like the Dystopian authors but around easy answers She doesn't force the reader to decide for themselves what is best she makes it clear what she wants us to think Her book is didactic which means that it instructs the reader what to believeEven if her conclusions about Individuality vs Community are correct she doesn't present arguments she only presents conclusions Like rote memorization or indoctrination she teaches nothing about the politics social order economics or psychology of totalitarianism or individuality The reader is not left with an understanding just an opinionThe baseless 'individuality' of the book lets the reader imagine that they are rebels that they are bucking the system even as they fall into lock step By letting the reader think they are already free thinking Lowry tricks them into forgetting their skepticismShe is happy to paint a simple world of black and white and this is likely the world she sees I doubt she is purposefully creating an insidious text she just can't see past her own opinions She writes this book with a point to make and makes it using emotional appeals and symbolism She doesn't back it up with arguments because she doesn't seem to have developed her opinions from cogent argumentsIn the end she doesn't show us that the structure of this society is wrong she says nothing poignant about individuality vs community; instead she relies on threats to the life of an innocent infant Yet nowhere does she provide an argument for why communal living or the sacrifice of freedoms for safety must necessarily lead to infanticideIn politics making extreme claims about the opposing side is called mud slinging it is an underhanded and dishonest tactic It works Arguing intelligently is difficult accusing is easy so that's what Lowry doesShe is another child of WWII and the Cold War who hasn't learned her lesson She uickly condemns the flaws of others while failing to search out her own Even after the Holocaust there are many racist nationalist violent Jews; conflict rarely breeds a new understandingAmerica condemned the faceless communal life of the Second World and yet America created The Projects We critiued strong governmental controls but we still have the bank bailout socialized medicine socialized schooling and socialized charity America condemned the Gulags and Work Camps and yet we imprison one out of every hundred citizens; far than Stalin ever did Some are killed all are dehumanizedAs a little sci fi adventure the book isn't terrible It's really the pretension that goes along with it Lowry cobbles together religious symbolism and Dystopic tropes and then tries to present it as something as complex and thoughtful as the authors she copied Copying isn't a crime but copying poorly isLike Dan Brown or Michael Crichton she creates a political pamphlet of her own ideals slaps a pretense of authority on it and then waits for the money and awards to roll in and they did Many people I've discussed this book with have pointed to those awards as the surest sign of this book's eminent worthAward committees are bureaucratic organizations Their decisions are based on political machinations This book is a little piece of Nationalism and so it was lauded by the political machine that Lowry supports The left hand helps the right If awards are the surest sign of worth then Titanic is a better movie than Citizen KaneWhat surprises me is how many of those who brought up the award as their argument were teachers If a politically charged administrative committee is the best way to teach children then why do you take umbrage when the principal tells you that bigger class sizes and fewer benefits are fine Listen to him doesn't he have award plauesThe other argument is usually that 'kids like it' I usually respond that kids also like candy so why not teach that Some people also get angry at me for analyzing a book written for children Of course it's not a great book it's for kids If you want a good book go read UlyssesI prefer to give children good books rather than pieces of political propaganda even if they agreed with me Children can be as skeptical uick witted and thoughtful as adults if you give them the chance so I see no excuse for feeding them anything less Kids aren't stupid they just lack knowledge and that's a fine distinction It's easy for adults to take advantage of their naivete their emotionality and their sense of worth Just because it's easier for the teacher doesn't mean it's better for the childWhen we show children something that is over simplified presenting an idealized crudely moralizing world we aren't preparing them for the actual world If you give a child a meaningless answer to repeat he will repeat it but he won't understand why Why not give the child a book that presents many complex ideas but no rote answers and let them make up their own minds If they don't learn how to separate the wheat from the chaff and form their own opinions early in a safe nurturing environment what chance will they have on their own as adultsIn all the discussions and research regarding this book I have come across very little analysis It's especially surprising for a book with such a strong following but there aren't many explanations of why the book is supposed to be useful or importantThis lack of argument makes sense from a political standpoint since there is no reason to analyze the worth of propaganda its worth is that it agrees with society and indoctrinates readers Analyzing it would defeat the purpose; political diatribes do not stand up to thoughtful attentionPerhaps someday someone will create a thoughtful textual analysis of this book that will point out its merits its structure and its complexity I've gradually come to doubt it I never expected when I wrote my original review of this book that it would garner this much attentionI still welcome comments and thoughts but if your comment looks roughly like this You should read this book again but this time like it You think you're smart but you aren't You're mean Lowry is great This book won awards and kids like it It's meant for kids anyways why would you analyze what its about I bet you never even read the seuels Go read 'Moby Dick' because you are full of yourselfI've heard that one before If you do want to comment though you might check out this article; I find it helps me with presenting my ideas

Lois Lowry Ö 4 Read

Ligne des dystopies jeunesse rendues hyper populaires par les mdias et leurs adaptations cinmatographiues The Giver ne fait donc The Giver Full Book Lois Lowry Free The Giver is a American young adult dystopian novel by Lois Lowry It is set in a society which at first appears to be a utopian society but is later revealed to be a dystopian one as the story progresses Addeddate Identifier TheGiverFullBook Identifier ark arktzbx Ocr ABBYY FineReader Ppi Scanner Internet Archive HTML Uploader plus The Giver Le Passeur Film complet en ligne HD The Giver Le Passeur ceci ici je peux diffuser le film en franais regarder un film en ligne streaming film franais en HD en ligne film en Streaming en ligne The Giver Le Passeur Film en franais Service de streaming en ligne Apple Movies espre dpasser de loin son rival aprs avoir inclus dans sa liste le film Marvel le plus regard Avengers Le Passeur Wikipdia Le Passeur titre original The Giver est un roman de Lois Lowry paru en en Amriue et en en France Ce roman est le premier d'une ttralogie ui comporte galement L'lue Messager et Le Fils Le livre a pu tre jug inappropri pour un jeune public en dpit de cela il a reu en la mdaille Newbery et a t vendu plus de millions d The Giver le passeur Film de science fiction sur Tl The Giver le passeur Toutes les informations de diffusion les bandes annonces les photos et rediffusions de The Giver le passeur avec Tl Jours The Giver le passeur de Phillip Noyce Film de The Giver le passeur amricain Ralis par Phillip Noyce h avec Brenton Thwaites Jeff Bridges Meryl Streep Film de science fiction Sortie le octobre O On n’aime pas The Giver Wikipdia The Giver ou Le Passeur au ubec est un film de science fiction amricain ralis par Phillip Noyce et sorti en Il est tir du livre de Lois Lowry Le Passeur Synopsis Dans le futur les motions ont t supprimes grce l'effacement de toute trace d'histoire Tous les individus sont formats pour se comporter de faon prtablie Le dpositaire de la mmoire est Telecharger The Giver Dvdrip Uptobox fichie. 45 HOLY STARSI don't remember reading a book as fast as I read this oneIt was a great readI couldn't put the book down for hoursAnd I must say is different from other books that I have read so this review actually is going to be somehow different from othersSo let's startI enjoyed the beginning maybe because it looked like dystopian kind of book and as you may know I love dystopian booksAlso the colorless nature and emotionless were things that made me to continue read the bookThis is one of those books that keeps getting interesting page by page What I really enjoyed from this book the reason why I gave it 45 stars is because there were some moments described so beautifully and full of energy and lifeSomehow they made me think about life and all things that it has the nice the cruel the dreams the goals the feels everything and how beautiful it isI'm not this emotional but I must say that they were some sentences that are worth reading over and over againThis book also shows how life would be without colors emotions without the fun of itIt sucks OkaySo let's move to the story This book is about a boy called Jonas who lives in a world full of order and rulesHe has two bestfriends one of them is this girl called FionaAt the ceremony he is chosen to be the reciever of memories and from that moment his life changes Characters JonasI liked this characters because I can relate to him somehowHe is smartcaring and most important curious about thingsAnd that curiosity leads him to the impossible knownFionaWhat I really liked about Fiona is her rebel sideShe breaks the rules almost every time but on the other side she is caring and fights for people she loves Me while reading the bookfavorite sentences “For the first time he heard something that he knew to be music He heard people singing Behind him across vast distances of space and time from the place he had left he thought he heard music too But perhaps it was only an echo” “I liked the feeling of love' Jonas confessed He glanced nervously at the speaker on the wall reassuring himself that no one was listening 'I wish we still had that' he whispered“Of course they needed to care It was the meaning of everything” “now he saw the familiar wide river beside the path differently He saw all of the light and color and history it contained and carried in its slow moving water; and he knew that there was an Elsewhere from which it came and an Elsewhere to which it was going” “Even trained for years as they all had been in precision of language what words could you use which would give another the experience of sunshine” “Things could change Gabe Jonas went on Things could be different I don't know how but there must be some way for things to be different There could be colors And grandparents he added staring through the dimness toward the ceiling of his sleepingroom And everybody would have the memories“And here in this room I re experience the memories again and again it is how wisdom comes and how we shape our future” “The worst part of holding the memories is not the pain It's the loneliness of it Memories need to be shared” It's so worth readingI highly recommendit to you if you life dystopian booksAlso the movie is out nowPictures from the review are not mine I took them mostly from Google images or Tumblr

review Û PDF, DOC, TXT or eBook Ö Lois Lowry

The GiverR The Giver Annee de production octobre Genre Sience fiction ualit Dvdrip French hmin Dans un futur lointain les motions ont t radiues en supprimant toute trace d'histoire Seul The Giver a la lourde tche de se souvenir du pass en cas de ncessit On demande alors au jeune Jonas de devenir le prochain THE GIVER Le Passeur Bande Annonce VF Dans le futur toutes les motions la guerre la souffrance et les diffrences ont t radiues Enfin presue ★Amateur de SF ? Ne Rate pas A http The Giver Plot Overview | SparkNotes The giver is written from the point of view of Jonas an eleven year old boy living in a futuristic society that has eliminated all pain fear war and hatred There is no prejudice since everyone looks and acts basically the same and there is very little competition Everyone is unfailingly polite The society has also eliminated choice at age twelve every member of the community is The Giver The Giver by Lois Lowry The giver The Giver uartet Lois Lowry The Giver is a American young adult dystopian novel by Lois Lowry It is set in a society which at first appears to be utopian but is revealed to be dystopian as the story progresses The novel follows a year old boy named Jonas The society has taken away pain and strife by converting to Sameness a plan that has The Giver video dailymotion Watch The Giver Chelma Tucker on Dailymotion Search Library Log in Sign up Watch fullscreen years ago | views The Giver Chelma Tucker Follow years ago | views Report Browse videos Playing next Watch The Giver in HD Watch The Giver free movie Watch The Giver Online Saild cool About For Books The Giver The Giver Traduction giver franais | Dictionnaire anglais | Reverso There is no giver without somebody that receives Il n'y a pas de donneur sans uelu'un ui reoit A system practicing the method receives an identification of a giver and recipient Un systme mettant en œuvre le procd reoit une identification d'un donneur et d'un destinataire You seek the gift but ignore the giver Vous cherchez le don tout en ignorant le donateu. If there are no wrong answers can we really say that something has any meaningIt is very easy to start an interesting science fiction story Simply begin with a mystery Don't explain things to the reader and leave them in a state of wonder In this way everything will seem interesting intriguing and worth exploring Tap into the reader’s powers of imagination and allow them to make your story interesting in ways you need not imagine and perhaps cannot create This is a good plan for starting a science fiction story Lots of science fiction stories begin in this way On television almost all of them do – ‘X Files’ ‘Lost’ ‘Battlestar Galactica’ ‘The 4400’ ‘The truth is out there’ ‘They have a plan’‘The Giver’ starts in this way In the first few pages as the setting unfolded I was struck by the parallels to China after the cultural revolution – the bicycles the uniform like clothing the regulated life the shame based culture and ‘the sameness’ I also thought of China because I immediately grasped that this had to be a culture which was designed to gently crash its population There were many clues that the world was heavily overpopulated and the primary goal of the culture so described was to crash the population without descending into society destroying anarchy the highly regulated birthrate which was insufficient to sustain the population To sustain the population than 17 out of each 25 females would have to be assigned to be birth mothers and this clearly wasn’t the case The replacement rate for a society is about 23 live births per female maybe 21 in a society that is safe and careful – clearly they were implied to be below this ratio so clearly this was a society that was trying to shed population Eually clearly this was a society that engaged in widespread euthanasia for the most trivial of causes which hints at a culture which doesn’t value life because people are in such abundance that they can be readily disposed of I suspected that ‘Release’ was euthanasia almost immediately from the context in which it was introduced and this was almost immediately confirmed when it was revealed that infants were subject to ‘release’ Clearly infants can't be meaningfully banished so clearly release was euthanasia So I was intrigued by the story I wanted to see what happened to Jonas and his naive family who had so poised themselves on the edge of a great family wrecking tragedy in just the first few dozen pages of the story I wanted to receive from the storyteller answers to the uestions that the story was poising if not some great profound message then at least some story that followed from what she beganBut it was not to be The first clue that the whole construct was to eventually come crashing down was that Jonas clearly didn’t understand ‘release’ to mean ‘euthanasia’ Nor in fact did anyone seem to know what ‘release’ meant This shocked me because in the context of the setting it was virtually impossible that he and everyone else did not know I could very easily imagine a stable society where human life was not prized – after all societies that believe that human life is intrinsically valuable are historically far less common than ones that don’t We know that the society is life affirming both because we are told how pained and shocked they are by loss and by the fact that Jonas responds to scenes of death with pity and anger What I could not believe in was a society which held the concept of ‘precision of language’ so tightly and so centrally that the protagonist could not imagine lying could in fact be founded on lies That’s impossible No society like that can long endure Some technological explanation would be reuired to explain how the society managed to hide the truth from itself If release took place in some conscious state of mind then surely the dispensers of Justice the Nurturers the Caregivers and the sanitation workers would all know the lie and all suspect – as Jonas did – that they were being lied to as well Surely all of these would suspect what their own future release would actually entail and surely at least some of them would reject it Surely some not inconseuential number of new children reared to value precision of language and to affirm the value of life would rebel at the audacity of the lie if nothing else Even in a society that knew nothing of love even if only the society had as much feeling as the members of the family displayed and even if people only valued others as much as the Community was shown to value others surely some level of attachment would exist between people Soma or not the seeds of pain tragedy conflict and rebellion are present if ever the truth is known to anyoneNothing about the story makes any sense None of it bears any amount of scrutiny at all The seriously you consider it the stupid and illogical the whole thing becomes We are given to believe that the society has no conception of warfare to the point that it cannot recognize a child’s war game for what it is and yet we are also given to believe that they train pilots in flying what is implied to be a fighter craft and that the community maintains anti aircraft weapons on a state of high alert such that they could shoot down such a fighter craft on a moments notice We are given to believe that all wild animals are unknown to the community yet we are also given to believe that potential pest species like suirrels and birds are not in fact extinct How do you possibly keep them out of the community if they exist in any numbers elsewhere We are given to believe that technology exists sufficient to fill in the oceans and control the weather and replace the natural biosphere with something capable of sustaining humanity but that technological innovation continues in primitive culture We are given to believe that they are worried about overpopulation and starvation and yet also that most of the world is empty and uninhabited or that this inherently xenophobic community lives in isolation if in fact it doesn’t span the whole of the Earth We are given to believe that this is a fully industrial society yet the community at most has a few thousands of people Surely thousands of such communities must exist to maintain an aerospace industry to say nothing of weather controllers Why is no thought given to the hundreds of other Receivers of Memory which must exist in their own small circles of communities in the larger Community Surely any plan which ignores the small communities place in the larger is foredoomed to failure Surely the Receiver of Memory knows what a purge or a pogrom isHow are we to believe that Jonas’s father whose compassion for little Gabriel is so great that he risks breaking the rules for his sake whose compassion for little Gabriel is so great that he risks face by going to the committee to plead for Gabriel’s life whose compassion for little Gabriel is so great that he discomforts himself and his whole family for a year for the sake of the child is the same man who so easily abandons that same child at a single setback when he has witnessed the child grow and prosper Doesn’t it seem far easier to believe that this same man who is openly scornful of the skills and nurturing ability of the night crew would readily blame the night crew for Gabriel’s discomfort I can only conclude just as I can only conclude about the illogical fact that no one knows what release is that everything is plastic within the dictates of the plot Jonas’s father feels and acts one way when the needs of the plot reuire it and feels and acts in different ways when the needs of the plot reuire something else What I can’t believe is that this is any sort of whole and internally consistent character or setting Every single thing when held up to the light falls apart There is not one page which is even as substantial as tissue paperIt is almost impossible to draw meaning from nonsense so it is no wonder that people have wondered at the ending What happens The great virtue of the story as far as modern educators are probably concerned is that there are no wrong answers What ever you wish to imagine is true is every bit as good of answer as any other Perhaps he lives Perhaps he finds a community which lives in the old ways knowing choice – and war and conflict which probably explains why the community needs anti aircraft defenses But likely from the context he dies Perhaps he is delusional Perhaps he gets to the bottom and lies down in the deepening snow which the runners can no longer be pushed through and he dies Perhaps he dies and goes to heaven maybe even the heaven of the one whose birthday is celebrated by the implied Holiday Perhaps it is even the case that he was sent to his death by the cynical Giver who knew his death was necessary to release the memories he contained by to the community Perhaps he didn’t just die but was slaughtered as the sacrificial lamb – killed by a murderous lie from the one he trusted too well For my entry in the meaningless answers contest I propose that the whole thing was just a dream This seems the easiest way to explain the contradictions A dream doesn’t have to make sense And the biggest clue that it is a dream is of course that Jonas sees the world in black and white with only the occasional flashes of recognized color around important colorful things as is typical of that sort of black and white dream Perhaps Jonas will wake up and engage in dream sharing with his family and they will laugh at the silliness and then go to the ceremony of twelves Or perhaps the whole community is only a dream and Jonas will wake up and go downstairs and open his Christmas presents with his family